UK Government Proposes Imprisonment for Tech Execs Over Non-Consensual Image Sharing
The UK government is escalating its fight against the spread of non-consensual intimate images online. Proposed changes to a crime bill could see tech executives facing imprisonment if their platforms fail to remove such content promptly.
The U.K. government announced on Friday it has formally submitted a proposed change to a crime bill that would allow tech executives who fail to remove nonconsensual intimate images published on their platforms to be imprisoned.
A U.K. communications regulator, **Ofcom**, has said it will be cracking down on the spread of the images in the aftermath of the **Grok** scandal, which led to millions of βnudifiedβ images of women and children being circulated worldwide.
The scandal led to a worldwide backlash and condemnation from multiple national governments, which pledged to stop the practice.
### Executive Liability
βTech execs could be held personally liable if platforms fail to comply with Ofcomβs enforcement decisions to remove peopleβs intimate images that have been shared without consent,β according to a government press release.
βThis would mean senior execs who commit the offense without a reasonable excuse could be liable to imprisonment or a fine, or both.β
### Tight Deadlines and Stiff Penalties
In February, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the crime law containing the new amendment would mandate that tech companies take down nonconsensual intimate images within two days or face fines and the blockage of services. Imprisonment was not mentioned as a potential penalty at the time, making Fridayβs announcement a significant escalation in the governmentβs approach to the issue.
On January 13, about three weeks after Grok started spreading millions of nudified images, Ofcom announced a probe of the chatbotβs practices. Grok is owned by **Elon Muskβs** **xAI**.
In a Guardian opinion piece published at the time, Starmer wrote that the mass distribution of nonconsensual intimate images is a βnational emergency.β
βWe are putting tech companies on notice,β he added. βThe burden of tackling abuse must no longer fall on victims. It must fall on perpetrators β and on the companies that enable harm.β