Senate Committee Advances GUARD Act: Protecting Children or Overly Restricting AI Access?
The Senate Judiciary Committee has advanced the GUARD Act, a bill aimed at preventing AI companies from allowing children to use AI companions. While proponents argue it protects children from harmful interactions, critics raise concerns about overly broad language that could restrict access to beneficial AI tools.
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday advanced a bill that would bar artificial intelligence companies from letting children use AI companions.
### GUARD Act Details
The bill, known as the **GUARD Act**, requires that AI chatbots advise users of all ages that they are not human and lack professional credentials. It also makes it a crime for AI companions to knowingly ask kids for sexual content or to produce it.
The legislation, introduced by lead sponsor Sen. **Josh Hawley** (R-MO), was marked up by the committee in a unanimous bipartisan vote.
### Concerns Over Broad Language
Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates have criticized the bill for including what they say is overly broad language that could prevent kids from using chatbots for homework help or to engage with customer service representatives.
The GUARD Act requires age-gating for all internet users, who will be asked to verify their ages with a βreasonable age verificationβ system before engaging with an AI companion. The bill also requires ongoing verification meaning that users will have to produce ID, biometric identifiers or financial data every time they talk to an AI companion.
The bill defines an AI chatbot broadly by covering any system that provides answers that arenβt βfully predeterminedβ by developers.
### Potential Impact on Companies and Users
Companies that violate the law can be fined up to $100,000 per violation. Civil libertarians say the steep fines will cause firms to overcorrect and restrict minors from using even basic AI tools, including search engines.
"Faced with legal uncertainty and serious liability, companies wonβt parse small distinctions. Theyβll restrict access, limit features, or block minors entirely,β the **Electronic Frontier Foundation** said in a Monday blog post.
βYoung people β and all people β deserve protection from genuinely harmful products. But this bill doesnβt do that. It trades away privacy, access, and useful technology in exchange for a blunt system that misses the mark.β
### Arguments for the Bill
Senators behind the bill say it addresses the serious threat that chatbots pose to children. They argue that chatbots have facilitated sexual exchanges with minors and encouraged some to commit suicide.
In February 2024, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer killed himself after spending several hours every day engaging with a chatbot that told him to βcome homeβ in their last conversation.
In April 2025, Adam Raine, 16, committed suicide after interacting obsessively with **ChatGPT**. Raineβsβ parents say the chatbot discussed suicide methods with him.