FTC Slaps Cox Media Group with $880,000 Fine for Deceptive 'Active Listening' Ad Claims
The **Federal Trade Commission (FTC)** has penalized **Cox Media Group (CMG)** and two other marketing firms, **MindSift LLC** and **1010 Digital Works**, for allegedly misleading businesses with false claims about their 'Active Listening' ad targeting service. The companies purported to leverage audio recordings from consumers' smart devices, but the FTC found these claims to be unsubstantiated.
The **Federal Trade Commission (FTC)** announced on Thursday that **Cox Media Group (CMG)** and two other marketing companies, **MindSift LLC** and **1010 Digital Works**, have agreed to collectively pay nearly $1 million to settle allegations that they deceived their customersβother businessesβby claiming that they could help target ads based on audio recordings collected from consumersβ smart devices via a marketing service called Active Listening.
### CMG's Response
In a statement to WIRED, a spokesperson for CMG says, βWe are pleased to have this matter resolved. Our local marketing team relied on marketing materials provided to us by a third-party vendor about their product. We withdrew the materials expeditiously and stopped further use of the product.β
MindSift and 1010 Digital Works did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
### Stoking Privacy Fears
Over the years, conspiracy theories about companies listening to people through their phones in order to serve them ads have been repeatedly debunked. The marketing about Active Listening, which was first reported by **404 Media**, stoked those fears. According to the FTC, at one point a website advertising the service included the slogan, βCreepy? Sure. Great for marketing? Definitely.β
### Allegations of False Advertising
In three separate complaints, the FTC says that CMG made several claims about its ability to collect consumersβ conversations from βsmartphones, smart TVs, smart speakers and other devicesβ and then use AI to target ads to potential customers based on where they live and what they said. CMG and the other companies also said that consumers had consented to the collection and use of their voice data, according to the complaints.
The FTC alleges that none of those things were true.
Instead, the FTC contends that what CMG was offering was βnothing more than consumer email list buyingβ and that the lists it resold were βa significant markup over the cost of the data.β
### Settlement Terms
As part of their agreements with the FTC, CMG and the two other companies promised not to make misrepresentations about their marketing services or their collection and use of audio recordings or transcripts of consumer conversations.
CMG agreed to pay $880,000, while MindSift and 1010 Digital Works each agreed to pay $25,000. The combined $930,000 will go to businesses that were βimpactedβ by the three companiesβ practices, according to the FTCβin other words, businesses that purchased the Active Listening marketing service because they were under the impression that the service worked as advertised, including that people consented to having their voice data used.
### FTC's Stance
The FTCβs complaints donβt make allegations about whether itβs illegal to use audio recordings collected from peopleβs smart devices to target them with ads, but the FTC clearly has a problem when a company says it does that but actually doesnβt. In a statement, Christopher Mufarrige, the FTCβs director of the bureau of consumer protection, says, βIt is a basic rule of business that you need to be honest with your customers, and these companies failed to do that.β