US Terrorist Designation Forces Italian Privacy Collective Autistici/Inventati to Shut Down
The Italian technology collective **Autistici/Inventati (A/I)** has announced its closure after the U.S. government designated it a 'terrorist organization' and imposed sanctions. This move, which targeted a volunteer-run group providing free, privacy-focused digital services to thousands, has sparked significant debate about digital sovereignty and the impact of unilateral sanctions on non-commercial online infrastructure.
The Italian technology collective **Autistici/Inventati (A/I)**, a long-standing provider of privacy-focused digital services, has ceased operations following its designation as a "terrorist organization" by the U.S. government.
Founded in 2001 on principles of an open, anti-capitalist, and anti-fascist internet, **A/I** offered free services including 16,000 email addresses, 1,500 websites, 5,500 mailing lists, and a network of 10,000 blogs, all committed to user data protection.
### U.S. Designation and Immediate Fallout
On August 26, the **U.S. State Department** labeled **A/I** an "extremist group," alleging it provided infrastructure for "far-left militants across the world." The designation warned that anyone engaging financially with **A/I** risked exposure to sanctions.
According to the State Department, **A/I**'s "cadre of radical hackers and tech developers provide a full spectrum of services β including encrypted chats and email, web hosting, secure video conferencing and streaming, anonymity shields, and a suite of other technological tools β to Marxist, anarchist, and other left-wing extremist groups." The agency cited examples of alleged reliance on **A/I**'s infrastructure for violent attacks, though it did not accuse **A/I** itself of organizing such activities.
Initially defiant, **A/I** responded by stating the U.S. had "unjustly designated us as terrorists" and was attempting to "wipe us out with a unilateral decree β an arbitrary one."
The impact was swift. On August 28, the **Public Interest Registry**, operator of the .org domain, suspended **A/I**'s domain. Concurrently, **Banca Etica**, **A/I**'s Italian bank, froze its account due to sanctions risks, while "strongly condemn[ing] the use of OFAC listings for political purposes."
On Sunday, **A/I** announced its shutdown, citing the risk of legal and financial consequences for those associated with it. The collective stated, "Under these circumstances, we are no longer able to maintain our original mission β offering secure and non-commercial digital tools," and committed to providing users with instructions for backing up their data.
### A Legacy of Digital Solidarity
**Mallory Knodel**, executive director of the **Social Web Foundation**, highlighted **A/I**'s role in democratizing internet information long before the rise of today's tech giants. She noted that the need for platforms resilient to government surveillance intensified after **Edward Snowden**'s revelations about the **National Security Agency (NSA)**'s extensive data collection.
While not widely known outside activist circles, the loss of **A/I**'s popular blogging platform, **Noblogs**, is considered "staggering" by Knodel. **Anne Roth**, a digital policy advisor for Germany's leftist party, who started a blog on **Noblogs** in 2007, expressed a profound sense of loss, feeling as though "someone is sort of just stealing my home from me β my online home."
### Broader Implications for Digital Sovereignty
This incident has also exposed tensions between the U.S. and Europe regarding tech hegemony and digital sovereignty. The **European Digital Rights (EDRi)** advocacy group, in a statement supporting **A/I** before its closure, asserted that the sanctions undermine European sovereignty and "create a dangerous precedent for non-commercial hosts, registrars and privacy-preserving services across Europe."
Roth voiced alarm over the immediate capitulation of entities like the **Public Interest Registry** to U.S. government threats. She questioned the broader implications when "just a decision by the State Department, and then all this internet governance structure falls apart," emphasizing the lack of judicial procedure in such designations.